🔍 IAM Buzzwords Decoded: From Boardroom Talk to Real-World Practice
But do we really? Let's talk about the buzzwords everyone uses—but few truly understand.
A few days ago, I was catching up with a fellow cybersecurity professional. Same industry. Same meetings. Same regulatory pressures.
But mid-conversation, he paused and said something that stayed with me:
“We keep throwing terms like Zero Trust, PAM, and NHI around in meetings… but if you ask me to break them down in context, I’m not sure I can.”
And that hit me. Because I’ve been in meetings where everyone nods in agreement—but you can feel the silent confusion in the room. Where people are scared to ask, “Wait, what exactly does that mean in our environment?”
So let’s change that. Let’s stop pretending we’re on the same page and actually get on the same page.
This article is not just for IAM professionals—it’s for IT managers, security analysts, architects, and even non-tech leads who are part of IAM discussions and want to stop feeling like imposters in acronym-heavy meetings.
Let’s unpack the real meaning behind the IAM buzzwords we use every day—and how they actually show up in our systems, our audits, and our team culture.
🔐 Zero Trust – A Mindset, Not a Marketing Slide
You’ve heard it.
“We’re moving toward a Zero Trust architecture.”
But often, that means:
MFA turned on for one or two apps ✅
VPN access locked down a bit more 🔒
Some conditional policies sitting unused in the portal 💤
What it’s supposed to mean: "Never trust, always verify." Every user, every device, every request must prove it belongs—every single time.
📍 Relatable scenario: Your CFO works from home and logs in at 11 PM from a different device. Do you trust them because they’re an exec? Or challenge the session and ask for strong re-authentication? Zero Trust says: verify first, then allow.
But here’s where many orgs fall short: They apply Zero Trust to people, but not to systems or non-human identities (more on that below 👇).
#ZeroTrust
👥 Identity Governance & Administration (IGA) – The Guardrails We Ignore
Too often, identity governance becomes an afterthought. It’s seen as “just access reviews” or “compliance paperwork.”
But the real power of IGA lies in the questions it forces us to ask:
Who has access to what?
Why do they still have it?
Who approved it?
When should it have been removed?
If your team still manages access with Excel sheets, Outlook approvals, and tribal knowledge... 🛑 That’s not governance. That’s hope-based security.
🧩 What governance looks like in practice:
Dynamic role modeling based on job functions
Delegated access certification campaigns
Enforcement of segregation of duties
Clean joiner/mover/leaver workflows
📍 The real-world impact? You pass your audit without panic. You prevent toxic combinations before they happen. And you actually reduce your attack surface through better decisions.
#IdentityGovernance #IGA
🕒 Just-in-Time (JIT) Access – Because Standing Access is a Time Bomb
In every company, there’s at least one engineer with more access than anyone can explain.
“He’s been here forever.” “She built the environment.” “We’ll remove it… eventually.”
That’s how privilege creep starts. And that’s exactly what JIT access aims to fix.
🧠 What JIT really means:
Access is granted only when needed
Only for the time required
Automatically removed after
📍 Example: An engineer requests elevated access to Production DB for 1 hour to resolve a P1 incident. They get it. The access is logged, monitored, and auto-revoked. No ticket? No approval? No access.
This removes standing privilege, limits lateral movement, and creates an audit trail. It’s not just clean—it’s defensible.
#JustInTimeAccess
🧠 Behavioral Analytics – Security That Actually Thinks
Let’s say a user logs in from Chicago every day.
Suddenly, there's a login from Tokyo at 2AM. Should that be allowed? Blocked? Challenged?
This is where behavioral analytics and risk-based authentication step in.
🧠 They look at:
Geolocation
Time of access
Resource sensitivity
User behavior history
And then make real-time decisions:
Silent allow
Step-up authentication
Session termination
📍 Why it matters: Because not all logins are equal. And not all users should be trusted the same way all the time.
#BehavioralAnalytics #RiskBasedAccess
🤖 Non-Human Identities (NHI) – The Hidden Majority in Your Environment
This one’s a sleeper—but critical.
Your org probably has:
More service accounts than employees
API keys that never expire
Scripts that run with domain-level access
DevOps tools spinning up workloads faster than they’re secured
These are non-human identities—and they’re outpacing humans in modern infrastructure.
📍 Why they matter: Because NHIs don’t go on PTO. They don’t quit. They don’t raise red flags unless they’re misused.
And attackers know that.
🧠 Managing NHI means:
Lifecycle control for service accounts
Privilege rotation and vaulting
Behavior monitoring (yes, even for bots)
Just-in-time access and session limits
#NonHumanIdentities #NHI
🔄 Identity Lifecycle Management (ILM) – The Core You Can’t Ignore
Every time someone joins, moves, or leaves… Your IAM stack gets tested.
And every time the ILM process is manual, broken, or inconsistent… ⚠️ You leave a door open.
📍 Real-life impact of poor ILM:
Ex-employees still having VPN access
Contractors with access long after contracts end
“Ghost” accounts no one remembers
A mature ILM system means:
Automatic provisioning on Day 1
Role-based access updates on role change
Immediate deprovisioning on termination
And most importantly: 🧹 Fewer identity messes to clean up.
#ILM #IdentityLifecycle
🔐 MFA, SSO, Passwordless – Great Tools, Bad Defaults
You rolled out MFA. Great. But are users bypassing it with fallback to SMS? Are admins exempt “for convenience”? Are your service accounts excluded entirely?
🧠 Authentication strategy is not just a tool decision—it’s a policy and enforcement decision.
What good looks like:
MFA is enforced contextually
SSO is standardized and managed
Passwordless is real—not just a label
What bad looks like:
“We have MFA” → but it’s optional
“We use SSO” → but 40% of apps aren’t integrated
“We’re passwordless” → but not for legacy systems
#MFA #SSO #Passwordless
🔚 Final Thoughts: Buzzwords Don’t Make You Secure. Understanding Does.
IAM is one of the most complex and misunderstood layers in the security stack. It spans users, roles, machines, cloud, compliance, HR, and IT.
But it’s also the most human.
Because behind every identity is:
A new hire waiting to be onboarded
A contractor whose access wasn’t revoked
A workload making decisions in production
A CISO trying to sleep at night
💬 So next time you hear “We’ve implemented Zero Trust with PAM, ILM, JIT, and risk-based access,” Don’t just nod. Ask: “How exactly?”
Because clarity—not buzzwords—is what builds trust.
🙋♂️ Your Turn:
✅ Which of these buzzwords have you seen misunderstood in your org? ✅ What’s one IAM concept your team struggles to apply in real-world scenarios? ✅ What would you wish your leadership understood better about IAM?
Let’s talk about it 👇 Let’s make IAM understandable—for everyone in the room.
#ZeroTrust #IGA #ILM #JustInTimeAccess #BehavioralAnalytics #NonHumanIdentities #RiskBasedAccess #IdentityManagement #CyberSecurity #IAMLeadership #IdentityFirstSecurity
About the Author
Sameer Bhanushali is a seasoned IT professional with extensive experience in designing and implementing robust security frameworks. Sameer has been instrumental in advancing security practices across various sectors. He holds advanced certifications in IAM and Security.
As an Architect, Sameer specializes in helping organizations navigate the complexities of modern cybersecurity challenges, focusing on enhancing security posture through innovative solutions and best practices. His commitment to advancing the field of cybersecurity is reflected in his thought leadership and dedication to protecting sensitive information in an ever-evolving threat landscape.
🔗 LinkedIn Profile